Tahqiqāt-e Tārikh-e Ejtemā’i (Social History Studies)

ocial Changes in Babylonian Temples After the Babylonian Revolts in 484 BCE: Based on Limited Access Order(LAO) Theory

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Hossein Maleki Lotaki 1
Hossein Badamchi 2

1 PhD Graduate in Ancient Iranian History, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of History, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Tehran univercity, Tehran, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.30465/shc.2026.52709.2641
Abstract
Despite significant advances in Achaemenid studies, fundamental ambiguities about the revolts of 484 BCE remain persistent. Issues such as the fundamental causes of these uprisings, the precise role of temples in their formation and expansion, and the long-term consequences of these events on the power structure in Babylon have still not found convincing answers. The traditional perception of Xerxes as a harsh king who destroyed Babylonian temples does not align with archaeological evidence and cuneiform texts. This research seeks to answer the question: What was Xerxes' policy toward Babylonian temples after the revolts of 484 BCE, and what impacts did this policy have on the social structure of Babylon? Also, what was the role of temples in the Babylonian revolts against Xerxes and what were the causes of these uprisings? This research has been conducted using historical analysis methods and utilizing the Limited Access Order theory of Douglass North, John Wallis, and Barry Weingast. The results of this study show that Xerxes, contrary to traditional perceptions, adopted an intelligent and pragmatic policy that focused on restructuring the power structure. Instead of destroying temples, he transferred rents from rebellious Northern Babylonian families to loyal local families. This strategy included decentralization of power, creating constructive competition among new elites, and increasing their dependence on the court. As a result of these social changes, long-term stability was established in the region, and no significant revolts against Achaemenid rule occurred in Babylon thereafter.

Keywords

Achaemenids
Xerxes
Babylonian temples
484 BCE revolts
Limited Access Order
Subjects
Bibliography
Badamchi, H., 2013. The Decree of Cyrus the Great. Tehran: Negah-e Moaser. [In Persian].
Hassan Doost, Mohammad, 2019, Ancient Persian, Inscriptions, Dictionary, Tehran: Persian Language and Literature Academy. [In Persian].
Baker and M. Jursa (eds.), Approaching_the_Babylonian_Economy:_Proceedings
Beaulieu, Paul-Alain. (2018). "Uruk Before and After Xerxes: The Onomastic and Institutional Rise of the God Anu." In Xerxes and Babylonia: The Cuneiform Evidence, edited by C. Waerzeggers and M. Seire, 189-206. OLA 277. Leuven: Peeters.
Böhl, F.M.T. de Liagre (1962). “Die babylonischen Prätendenten zur Zeit des Xerxes”, BiOr 19, 110–114.
Bongenaar, A.C.V.M. (1997). The Neo-Babylonian Ebabbar Temple at Sippar: Its Administration_and_Its_Prosopography (PIHANS 80), Leiden.
Briant, P. (1992). “La date des révoltes babyloniennes contre Xerxes”, Studia_ Iranica 21, 7–20.
Cameron, G.G. (1941). “Darius and Xerxes in Babylonia”, AJSL 58, 314–325.
CAD: The Assyrian Dictionary of the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago
Hackl, J. (2013). Materialien_ zur_ Urkundenlehre_ und_ Archivkunde_ der_ spätzeitlichen Texten_aus_Nordbabylonien. PhD Dissertation, University of Vienna. In R. Achenbach (ed.), Persische Reichspolitik und lokale Heiligümer. BZAR 25.
Jursa, M. (2005). "Neo-Babylonian Legal and Administrative Documents: Typology, Contents and Archives." Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.
Jursa, M. (2007). The transition of Babylonia from the Neo-Babylonian empire to Achaemenid rule. In H. Crawford (ed.), Regime Change in the Ancient Near East and Egypt: From Sargon of Agade to Saddam Hussein (Proceedings of the British Academy 136). London: The British Academy, pp. 73-94.
Jursa, M. (2015). "Labor in Babylonia in the First Millennium BC". In P. Steinkeller & M. Hudson (Eds.), Labor in the Ancient World (pp. 345-396). ISLET.
Jursa, M. (2013). “Epistolographic Evidence for the Trips to Susa by Borsippean Priests and for the Crisis in Borsippa at the Beginning of Xerxes’ Reign”, ARTA 2013/003.
Jursa, Michael. (2018). "Xerxes: The Case of Sippar and the Ebabbar Temple." In Xerxes and Babylonia: The Cuneiform Evidence, edited by Caroline Waerzeggers and Maarja Seire, 63-72. Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 277. Leuven: Peeters.
Kessler, K. (2004). “Urukäische Familien versus babylonische Familien: Die Namengebung in Uruk, die Degradierung der Kulte von Eanna und der Aufstieg des Gottes Anu”, AoF_31, 237–262.
Kleber, K. (2019). The Religious Policy of the Teispid and Achaemenid Kings in Babylonia.
Kuhrt, A. (1990). “Alexander and Babylon”, in H. Sancisi-Weerdenburg and J. W. Drijvers (eds.), The_Roots_of_the_European_Tradition (Achaemenid History 5), Leiden, 121–130. Kurke, L.
Kuhrt, A. and S. Sherwin-White. (1987). "Xerxes' Destruction of Babylonian Temples." In The Greek Sources: Proceedings of the Groningen 1984 Achaemenid History Workshop, edited by H. Sancisi-Weerdenburg and A. Kuhrt, 69-78. Achaemenid History 2. Leiden: Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten.
Kümmel, Hans-Martin. (1979). ’’Familie, Beruf und Amt im spätbabylonischen Uruk: prosopographische Untersuchungen zu Berufsgruppen des 6’’. Jahrhunderts v. Chr. in Uruk. Abhandlungen der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft 20. Berlin: Gebr. Mann Verlag.
Oelsner, J. (2002). Babylonische Kultur nach dem Ende des babylonischen Staates. In R.G. Kratz (ed.), Religion und Religionskontakte im Zeitalter der Achämeniden (Veroffentlichungen der Wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft fur Theologie 22) Gutersloh: Kaiser, Gutersloher Verlagshaus, pp. 49–73.
Oelsner, J. (2007). “Das zweite Regierungsjahr des Xerxes (484/3 v. Chr.) in Babylonien”, in M. Köhbach et al. (eds.), Festschrift  für  Hermann Hunger zum 65. Geburtstag_gewidmet von seinen Freunden, Kollegen_und_Schülern (WZKM 97), Vienna, 289–303. 
of the START Project Symposium Held in Vienna, 1–3 July 2004 (AOAT 330), Münster, 343–363.
San Nicolo, M. (1934). “Zur Chronologie des Bel-šîmanni und Šamaš-erîba (Parerga Babylonica XIII)”, ArOr_6, 335–338.
Schaudig, H. (2001). Die Inschriften Nabonids von Babylon und Kyros' des Großen samt den in ihrem Umfeld entstandenen Tendenzschriften. Ugarit-Verlag.
Schmid, H. (1981). “Ergebnisse Einer Grabung am Kernmassiv der Zikurrat in Babylon”, BagM 12, 87–137.
Schmid, H. (1995). Der_Tempelturm_Etemenanki_ in_ Babylon_(Baghdader Forschungen 17), Mainz.
Stolper, M.W. (1990). Late Achaemenid legal texts from Uruk and Larsa. Baghdader Mitteilungen, 21, pp. 559–622.
Ungnad, A. (1907). “Bel-šîmannī, Ein neuer König Babylons und der Länder”, OLZ 10, 464–467.
Van Driel, G. (2002). Elusive Silver. In Search of a Role for a Market in an Agrarian Environment. Aspects of Mesopotamia's Society. Leiden: Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten.
Waerzeggers, C. (2003/2004). The Babylonian revolts against Xerxes and the 'end of archives'. Archiv für Orientforschung, 50, pp. 150-173.
Waerzeggers, C. (2010). The Ezida Temple of Borsippa: Priesthood, Cult, Archives. Leiden: Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten.
Waerzeggers, C. (2005). “The Dispersal History of the Borsippa Archives”, in H.D. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, pp. 99–120.
Tahqiqāt-e Tārikh-e Ejtemā’i (Social History Studies)
Volume 15, Issue 2 - Serial Number 30
Autumn and Winter 2025-2026
March 2026
Pages 235-265

  • Receive Date 09 August 2025
  • Revise Date 27 January 2026
  • Accept Date 31 January 2026

Home

Guide for Authors

Reviewers

Contact Us