Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Postdoctoral researcher of history in Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) and Isfahan University, Isfahan ,Iran.

2 Professor of History, University of Isfahan, Isfahan ,Iran

Abstract

Dealing with social classes in historical periods provides openness to understanding the current situation and getting out of the current social blockages from the area of scrutiny in historical texts. The present research examines local chronicles in order to extract the criteria of reflection of social classes in these texts and the statistics of social class fields. The main question of the research is that the criteria of reflection of social classes in the social history of local chronicles depend on which type of volume, combination and convertibility of capital in the fields of social classes? Therefore, the main hypothesis of the research is that the camouflaged class structure in the social history of the Safavid era indicates the pyramidal hierarchy of capital. This research has been compiled using the three-stage coding of foundation data and relying on the developmental structuralism of the contemporary sociologist, Pierre Bourdieu, regarding the fields of classes and their quadruple capitals and is based on five sources of local historiography of the Safavid era, including “Aḥyā al-Mulūk”, “Gilan history”, “Gilan and Daylamān history”,” Šarafnāmeh and Ḵānī history”. The result of the current research is that, the field of governance or court in local chronicles has the highest volume and amount of combination and the amount of transformation of social, economic, cultural and symbolic capital for the hidden classes in it. The field of trade and property is in the second place and the field of culture, poetry and art is in the next ranks. Also, in the lowest order, it is the field of community, which has the lowest volume and lowest amount of composition and conversion of all types of capital for its classes.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Extended Abstract

The framework social history of Iran's Shiites in the texts of local chronicles of the Safavid era

Dealing with social classes in historical periods provides openness to understanding the current situation and getting out of the current social blockages from the area of scrutiny in historical texts. The present research examines local chronicles in order to extract the criteria of reflection of social classes in these texts and the statistics of social class fields. The main question of the research is that the criteria of reflection of social classes in the social history of local chronicles depend on which type of volume, combination and convertibility of capital in the fields of social classes? Therefore, the main hypothesis of the research is that the camouflaged class structure in the social history of the Safavid era indicates the pyramidal hierarchy of capital. This research has been compiled using the three-stage coding of foundation data and relying on the developmental structuralism of the contemporary sociologist, Pierre Bourdieu, regarding the fields of classes and their quadruple capitals and is based on five sources of local historiography of the Safavid era, including Aḥyā al-Mulūk, Gilan history, Gilan and Daylamān history, Šarafnāmeh and Ḵānī history. The result of the current research is that the field of governance or court in local chronicles has the highest volume and amount of combination and the amount of transformation of social, economic, cultural and symbolic capital for the hidden classes in it. The field of trade and property is in the second place and the field of culture, poetry and art is in the next ranks. Also, in the lowest order, it is the field of community, which has the lowest volume and lowest amount of composition and conversion of all types of capital for its classes.

Introduction: Historical works, including chronicles, provide the raw materials needed by researchers to compile social history. One of these types of works is local chronicles, which the author tries to analyze and examine the contents of several of them. In the Safavid era, one of the components of Shiite social history is the description and evolution of the social classes of the society. Apart from religion (in the case of Sunnis), none of the indicators of blood, color, race and nationality were involved in obtaining positions and promoting the social base, and to a large extent, virtue and social power played an important role in raising the status and being close to the top of the pyramid, that is, the king. Of course, this does not mean that the class antagonism disappeared and separate social classes did not exist, rather it moves from a static situation to a flow where status distinctions are defined and reproduced over time in relation to cultural objects. In the Safavid era, the concept of capital can be considered in four economic, social, cultural and symbolic dimensions to show important resources (attitudes, habits, entertainments, tastes, beliefs and traditions) that are used in the daily life of people and define the space of social stratification based on class from the point of view of capital. In this era, with these four types of capital and the habits of each class as a model, three factors are influential in capital, including volume, composition and direction.

The main question of the research is that the criteria of reflection of social classes in the social history of the local chronicles of the Safavid Shia government depend on which type of volume, combination and convertibility of capital in the fields of social classes?

The current research has focused on the hypothesis that the camouflaged class structure in the social history of the Shiite Safavid state indicates the pyramidal hierarchy of capital.

Methods: This research has been compiled using the three-stage coding of foundation data and relying on the developmental structuralism of the contemporary sociologist, Pierre Bourdieu, regarding the fields of classes and their quadruple capitals and is based on five sources of local historiography of the Safavid era, including Aḥyā al-Mulūk, History of Gilan, History of Gilan and Daylamān, Šarafnāmeh and Ḵānī history, and it has been tried to examine the framework of social history in the local chronicles of the Safavid Shia government by using these.

Conclusion: Re-reading local chronicles as one of the important platforms for studying social history can help to open up our understanding of Iran's social structure in the transition of history.
In this regard, by moving away from the conventional two-stage coding, which has fewer possibilities to pass from the data level to the abstraction and analysis level, and using the three-stage coding available in the foundation's data method, the social classes of different social fields were extracted based on the criteria of introduction and representation of classes by historians of local chronicles were examined based on Bourdieu's theoretical apparatus (formative structuralism). These findings show that the social classes in terms of accumulation and volume and composition and route of capital, have been drawn, respectively, from the field of governance, to the fields of business and property, and then to the field of Shariat, and the fields of culture, poetry, literature, and art, and finally to the field of daily life. This class structure is indicative of a pyramidal structure in the social structure of the Safavid era, which oversees the accumulation of capital and its volume, composition, and transformation path, from top to bottom. At the same time, the relative dispersion of types of capital among fields and social classes, with different volume, composition, and convertibility, indicates a relatively less discriminatory social structure in the Safavid era. Of course, the test of this claim definitely requires an independent survey.

Keywords: Social history, social classes, habits, capital, local chronicles, Safavid.

The Holy Quran.
Anṣari, Ebrahim (1378), Theories of social stratification and its historical structure in Iran, Isfahan: University of Isfahan.
Aram, Moḥammad Baqer (1386), Historiographic thought of the Safavid era, Tehran: Amir Kabir
Bahrāmnežād, Moḥsen (1398), An introduction to understanding the foundations and infrastructures of the political-national identity of the Safavid government, Tehran: Research Center for Islamic History.
Bedlisi, Šaraf-Ḵān (1343), Šarafnāmeh, Tehran: Matbūat-e-Elmi.
Bourdieu, Pierre, (1984), Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Teste, Translated by: R. Nice, London: Routledge.
Bourdieu, Pierre, (2000), Pascaline Meditations, Translated by Richard Nice. Oxford: Polity Press.
Cook, J. M. (2014), Describing Counselors Social Class and Socioeconomic Status Understanding and Awareness, Dissertation submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
Coser, Louise (1373), The Life and Thought of Great Sociologists, Translated by Moḥsen Ṯal’aṯi, Tehran: Elmi.
Craib, Ian (1382), Classical Social Theories, Translated by Šahnāz Mosammā-parast, Tehran: Āgah.
Creswell, John W. (2014), Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Approaches, California: Sage.
Delawaleh, Pietro (1370), Safarnāmeh, translated by Šuāuddin Šafā, Tehran, Scientific and Cultural Publications.
Foran, John (1377), The breakable resistance of the history of Iran's social developments from the Safavid era to the years after the Islamic revolution, Translated by Aḥmad Tadayon, Tehran: Rasā.
Fūmani, ‘Abdul Fattāḥ (1349), History of Gilan, Edited by Manūchehr Sotūdeh, Tehran: Iranian Culture Foundation.
Gerb, Edward (1373), Social Inequality: Perspectives of Classical and Contemporary Theorists, Translated by Moḥammad Siyāh-pūsh and Aḥmad-Rezā Ḡoravizād, Tehran: Mo’āṯer.
Giddens, Anthony (1387), Sociology, Translated by Manūchehr Ṣabūri, Tehran: Ney.
Gilbert, D. (2003), The American Class Structure – In an Age of Growing Inequality, California: Thompson Wadsworth.
Ḥosseini Estarābādi, Seyyed Ḥossein bin Morteżā (1366), History of the Sultanate from Sheikh Safi to Shah Safi, with effort by Eḥsān Ešrāqi, Tehran: Elmi.
Isfahani scribe, Emad al-Din (1356), Nusra al-Fatrah and Asra al-Fitrah, Talkhis Bandari of Isfahani under the name of Zubadeh al-Nusra and Nakhba al-Asra, translated by Mohammād Hossein Jālili under the name of History of the Seljuq Dynasty, Tehran: Farhang Iran Foundation.
Jenkins, Richard, (1992), Pierre Bourdieu, London: Routledge.
Ḵandmir, Ḡiyās-al-din (1333), Ḥabib al-Seyr, with introducing of Jalāl al-din Homāyi, Tehran: Khayyam.
Ḵātūn-Ābādi, Seyed Abdul-Ḥossein (1352), Vaqāye’e al-Senin or Annual reports from the beginning of creation until 1195 Hijri, Edited by Moḥammad-Bāqer Behbūdi, Tehran: Eslamiyeh Bookstore.
Lāhiji, ‘Ali bin Šamsuddin (1352), Ḵānī history, Edited by Manūchehr Sotūdeh, Tehran: Iranian Culture Foundation.
Mar’aši, Seyed Ẓahir al-Din bin Seyed Naṣr al-Din (1364), History of Gilan and Daylamān, Edited by Manūchehr Sotūdeh, Tehran: Eṭela’āt.
Marx, K. (1971), A contribution to the critique of political economy, London: sage publication.
Minorsky, Vladimir (1368), Administrative organization of the Safavid government (or Minorsky's comments on Tazkira al-Molūk), translated by Mas’ūd Rajabniyā, footnotes and introduction by Moḥammad Dabirsiyāqi, Tehran: Amir Kabir.
Mirzā-Rafi’ā, Moḥammad Rafi’ bin Ḥasan (1385), Dastūr al-Molūk, translated by ‘Ali Kordābādi, edited by Moḥammad Esmā’il Marchinovski, Tehran: Center for Records and History of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Mirzā-Sami’a, Moḥammad-Sami’ (1368), Tazkira al-Molūk and the administrative organization of the Safavid government, translated by Mas’ūd Rajabniyā, with the effort of Moḥammad Dabirsiyāqi, Tehran: Amir Kabir.
Ritzer, George (1395), Sociologist's theory, Translated by Hūshang Nāyebi, Tehran: Ney.
Roemer, Hans Robert (1380), Iran on the way to the new era, Translated by Āzar Āhangči, Tehran: University of Tehran.
Romlū, Ḥassan (1349). Aḥsan al-Tavāriḵ, by ‘Abdul Ḥossein Navāyi, Tehran: Bongāh-e-Tarĵomeh va Našr-e-Ketāb.
Savage, M. (2000), Class Analysis and Social Transformation, Buckingham: Open University Press.
Ṣefatgol, Mansūr (1381), Structure of institution and religious thought in Safavid Iran, Tehran: Rasā.
Sistāni, Malek Šah-Ḥossein (1344), Aḥyā al-Mulūk, Edited by Manūchehr Sotūdeh, Tehran: Bongāh-e-Tarĵomeh va Našr-e-Ketāb.
Šūštari, Qāżi Seyyed Nūrollāh (1377), Majlis al-Mu'minin, Vol. 1 and 2, Tehran: Islamia bookstore.
Torkmān, Eskandarbeyk (1382), History of the Abbasid worlds, with the efforts of Iraj Afšār, Tehran: Amir Kabir.
Turner, Jonathan H. (1998), The Structure of Sociological Theory. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Veblen, Thorstein. (1965), The Theory of the Leisure Class, New York: Modern Library.
Fārābi, Šahin; Edrisi, Mehri (1393), "Comparative study of social issues in local and dynasty chronicles of Shah ‘Abbās I Ṣafavi era", Local histories of Iran, second year, number 3, series 5, pp. 18-34.
Ḥasanzādeh, Isma’il (1386), "History and Historiography of ‘Emāduddin Kāteb Eṣfahāni", Al-Zahra Humanities, Volume 17, Number 65, pp. 21-55.
Keshāvarz, Zahrāsādāt et al. (1396), "Explanation and analysis of the role of social classes in the civilization process of the Safavid state", History of Islam and Iran, Volume 27, Number 34, Series 124, pp. 139-167.
Keshāvarz, Zahrāsādāt et al. (1398), "Investigation of the functional nature of the political structure with an emphasis on the function of the social system in the civilizing process of the Safavid government", Social History Research, Volume 9, Number 1, Series 17, pp. 271-297.
Liu, W. M., Soleck, G., Hopps, J., Dunston, K. and Pickett, T. Jr. (2004), “A New Framework to Understand Social Class in Counseling: The Social Class Worldview Model and Modern Classism Theory”, Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 32(2): 95–122.
Muntaner, C., Eaton, W. W. and Diala, C. C. (2000), “Social Inequalities in Mental Health: A Review of Concepts and Underlying Assumptions”, Health, No. 4(1): 89–113.
Raḥimifar, Mahnāz; Sa’idov, ‘Abdul Qahār (1392), "The social position of the waqifs in the Safavid era based on the dedication letters", History of Islamic Culture and Civilization, Vol. 4, Number 12, pp. 41-69.
Reid, James J. (2000), Studies in Safavid Mind, Society and culture, Costa Masa, CA: Mazda Publishers.  
Solṭāniān, Abuṭāleb (1395), "How the Safavid kings interacted with the peasant and rural class", History of Islam and Iran, Volume 26, Number 30, Series 120, pp. 166-141.
Šūrmij, Moḥammad (1400), "Comparative study of the historiography of ‘Ali Lāhiji and ‘Abdul Fattāh Fūmani", History of Islam, No. 85, pp. 101-130.
 ‘Azizi, Mahin (2014), "Social strata of the Safavid period from Shah Abbas I to the end of Shah Abbas II", master's thesis, Qazvin: Imam Khomeini International University (RA), Faculty of Humanities.
Ja’fari, ‘Ali-Akbar (1377), "Isfahan in the days of Safavids (a study of the political, social, economic and cultural situation of Isfahan 1000-1037 AH)", Master thesis, Isfahan: Isfahan University, Faculty of Literature and Humanities.
Mahdi-Ābādi, Zinat (2012), "Sistān during the Safavid Era (Politics, Society and Culture)", Master's Thesis, Qazvin: Imam Khomeini International University (RA), Faculty of Islamic Sciences and Research.