Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Research in Art , University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan,Iran

2 PhD in Islamic Art, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Iranian art history is basically dominated by men and the court. This art has mostly been supported by male patrons and artists, and whenever women appear, they play a minor role as the theme and subject of works. This trend, however, underwent a drastic change during the reign of Fath-Ali Shah in his court and in the hands of his artist daughters and other women. They started a new movement by putting their signatures under or at the end of their works, considered a unique act in its own by that time. In this essay such a trend has been studied besides considering others aspects of women’s art in the Qajar era up to the Pahlavi period in the Kamal-ol-Molk’s school and his female apprentices’ work. An evaluation of the extant cases and works demonstrates that signatures by the female artists, inside and outside the realm of court, have increased in the course of time as a result of several factors, including the women’s self-consciousness, evolution of educational system and a decline in despotism. The act of signing works implied some essential concepts the most significant of which were credit, ownership and personal identity.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Extended Abstract

The Status and Identity of Qajar Female Artists in Regard to Their Signatures

(From Fath-Ali Shah’s Reign to Early Pahlavi Era)

Iranian art history is basically dominated by men and the court. This art has mostly been supported by male patrons and artists, and whenever “women” may appear, they merely play a minor role as the theme or subject of works as dancers, lovers, musicians, courtesans, etc. The male signatures affixed to the works are also indicative of such domination and they imply the monopolistic hierarchy of art production in Iran. Meanwhile, scant attention has been devoted to the status of female artists as well as their signatures in their works. Accordingly, this issue requires thoughtful consideration. Despite having suffered shortage in the realms of politics and economy, Qajar era underwent some remarkable social, cultural and artistic development in the 19th century. The Persian art, on the other hand, has been mostly considered courtly and politics-orientated. Therefore, art patrons would play a major role in it. Such patrons were first and foremost the Shah, and after him, courtiers, nobles and aristocrats. They actually provided the artists with welfare and convenience by their patronage. The establishment of Qajar rule in 1785 initiated a period of relative stability in Iran which lasted through the 19th century to 1925. The Qajar era was accordingly the period of art revivalism following the decline of the Safavid dynasty, particularly during the comparatively long reigns of two of its monarchs, Fath-Ali Shah and Naser ad-Din Shah. It was in this period that they saw the stabilization of Iran’s borders to their present limits and maintained a cautious balance in domestic policy and in international relations. Considering the favorable circumstances, the artists could directly or indirectly put their names as well as those of their patrons in their works. This trend continued and underwent a drastic change during the reign of Fath-Ali Shah in his court and in the hands of his artist daughters and other women mostly settles in the Golestan Palace. The Golestan Palace was a vehicle for the expression of Qajar power, as the elaborate rituals of court ceremonial, seasonal festivities, anniversaries and receptions required a suitably impressive architectural and decorative environment. The palace also provided a home for the royal family, accommodation and subsistence for a large entourage, and on a practical level, stimulus for the local economy through employment of artists and skilled craftsmen. It was in such a palace that female artists found opportunity to improve their skills and to create art. They actually initiated a new movement by putting their signatures under or at the end of their works, considered a unique act in its own by that time. In this essay such a trend has been studied besides considering others aspects of women’s art in the Qajar era up to the Pahlavi period in the Kamal-ol-Molk’s school and his female apprentices’ work. The essay presents two main questions: How female signatures have undergone changes during the Qajar era to early Pahlavi period in calligraphy and painting? What does such a trend imply? For this purpose, it’s been tried to restrict the subject matter to those female artists who were merely working in the field of visual and applied arts. The act of putting signatures in the works was another criterion to be considered. On this basis, most of the cultural affairs, including societies of women, charities and civil activities, or sociological evolutions in the realms of politics and revolutionary developments have not been considered here. Poetry and literature were among the cases which were not included in the topic either. In this research, aesthetic evaluation of female artists’ works and the biographies of such artists did not constitute the main subject. However, the key issues of building one’s identity and artistic autonomy, as well as the study of female signatures in different art media, on the other hand, have been basically taken into consideration. An evaluation of the extant cases and works demonstrates that signatures by the female artists, inside and outside the realm of court, have increased over the time as a result of several factors, including the women’s self-consciousness, evolution of educational system and a decline in despotism. The act of adding signatures to the works by such women implied some essential concepts the most significant of which were extending one’s credit, retaining ownership and defining personal identity.

Keywords: Qajar, Female Artists, Signature, Identity.

Aghighi Bakhshayeshi, Ozra (1388/2009). Zanān-e Khoshnevis. Tehran: Kalhor. [In Persian]
Bayani, Mehdi (1363/1984). Ahvāl va Āsār-e Khoshnevisān. Tehran: Elmi. [In Persian]
Ekhtiar, Maryam (1381/2002). “Az Kārgāh va Bāzār tā Dāneshgāh” (From Workshop and Bazaar to Academy: Art Training and Production in Qajar Iran), in: Naqqāshi va Naqqāshān-e Dowre-ye Qājār. Translated to Persian by Ya’ghoub Azhand, Tehran: I’l-e Shahsavan-e Baghdadi. [In Persian]
Ettehadieh, Mansoureh (1389/2010). Zanān-i ke Zir-e Maqna’e Kolāhdāri Kardand. Tehran: Tarikh-e Iran. [In Persian]
Farrokhzad, Pouran (1381/2002). Kārnamāy-e Zanān-e Kārāy-e Irān. Tehran: Ghatreh. [In Persian]
Fazayeli, Habibollah (1362/1983). Atlas-e Khat. Esfahan: Mash’al-e Esfahan. [In Persian]
Hamedi, Mohammadhassan (1397/2018). Jostārhāyi dar Tārikh-e Irān. Tehran: Peikareh. [In Persian]
Hejazi, Banafsheh (1388/2009). Tārikh-e Khanom-hā (Barrasi-ye Jāygāh-e Zan-e Irāni dar Tārikh-e Qājār). Tehran: Ghasidehsara. [In Persian]
Jeddi, Mohammadjavad (1390/2011). Mohr-hāye Saltanati. Tehran: Ketabkhane-ye Mouzeh va Markaz-e Asnad-e Majles-e Shoray-e Eslami. [In Persian]
Karimzadeh Tabrizi, Mohammad-Ali (1370/1991). Ahvāl va Āsār-e Naqqāshān-e Qadim-e Irān. vol.3, Tehran: Mostowfi. [In Persian]
Khojasteh, Hassan. “Sākhtārbandi-ye Hoviat-e Zanān”, Pazhuhesh-hāye Ertebāti, no. 52 (1386/2007). [In Persian]
Mihan, Shiva. Fingernail Art: Three-dimensional Calligraphy and Drawing in the 19th-Century (https://digitalorientalist.com/2020/12/11/fingernail-art-three-dimensional-calligraphy-and-drawing-in-19th-century/)
Mohajer, Shahrouz & Mohammadhassan Hamedi (1393/2014). Maktab-e Kamāl ol-Molk. Tehran: Peikareh. [In Persian]
Mollamohammadi, Tahereh (1393/2014). Bānovān-e Khoshnevis-e Irān: Az Zeynab Shahdeh tā Omm-e Salameh. Tehran: Samira. [In Persian]
Mollamohammadi, Tahereh (1396/2017). Bānu Ziā os-Saltaneh: Khoshnevis-e Qājāri-Tabār. Tehran: Pazhouheshkade-ye Miras-e Farhangi va Gardeshgari. [In Persian]
Motaghedi, Kianoush & Sahar Goudarzi (1398/2019). Gerāyesh-hāye Novin dar Khoshnevisi-ye Qājār. Tehran: Mo’assese-ye Farhangi Honari-ye Ketab-arayi-ye Irani with cooperation of the Reza Abbasi Museum. [In Persian]
Nadrpour, Fatemeh (1395/2016). Barrasi-ye No’e Fa’āliat va Naqsh-e Zanān dar Arse-ye Honar-hāye Sonnati-ye Dowre-ye Qājār. MA dissertation, Tehran: Al-Zahra University. [In Persian]
Scarce, Jennifer (1401/2022). Farhang va Zendegi dar Irān-e Asr-e Qājār (Domestic Culture in the Middle East: An Exploration of the Household Interior). Translated to Persian by Marzieh Ghasemi & Alireza Baharlou, Tehran: Danyar. [In Persian]
Shafi’i, Somayehsadat (1400/2021). Tārikh-e Ejtemā’i-ye Zanān dar Asr-e Qājār. Tehran: Sales. [In Persian]
Sheil, Mary Leonora Woulfe (1368/1990). Khāterāt-e Leidi Shil (Glimpses of Life and Manners in Persia). Translated to Persian by Hassan Abutorabian, Tehran: Naw. [In Persian]
Soheili Khansari, Ahmad (1351/1972), An Introduction to Golestān-e Honar (in Persian), Qazi Ahmad Qomi, Ketankhane-ye Manouchehri. [In Persian]
Soltanifar, Sedigheh. “Mo’arrifi-ye Bānovān-e Quran-nevis”, Beynāb: Olum-e Quran va Hadith. no. 51 (1385/2006). [In Persian]
Tolou’i, Mahmoud (1377/1998). Az Tāvus tā Farah. Tehran: Elmi. [In Persian]
Watson, Robert Grant (1356/1978). Tārikh-e Iran az Ebtedā-ye Qarn-e 19 tā 1858 (A History of Persia from the Beginning of the Nineteenth Century to the Year 1858). Translated to Persian by Gholam-Ali Vahid Mazandarani, Tehran: Simorgh. [In Persian]
Zoka, Yahya (1388/2009). Tārikh-e Akkāsi va Akkāsān-e Pishgām dar Irān. Tehran: Elmi va Farhangi. [In Persian]