Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 PhD student of Ancient history, university of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

2 PhD student of history of Islam , university of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Nobility, as an important and widely used concept in social analysis, has not been understood the same throughout history and has different levels of meaning. The main issue of this essay is to understand the impact of the worldview of the two societies, late ancient Iran and the early Islamic as the two main origins, on the concept of nobility in the Islamic period of Iranian history. To answer this problem, the question must be answered as to what the nobility understood in late ancient Iran and early Islam.
Based on the conceptual history method, the present essay studies the social context of the mentioned societies in order to obtain conceptual components, and then, based on the comparative method, compares the components of nobility in these two societies.
In both societies, the ancestry of the nobility was very important, but the more complex social structure in ancient Iran, their dependence on land, and the ideology of the Iranian monarchy made the understanding of the nobility different from the tribal structure among the new Muslim Arabs.
This conceptual difference affected the social reality and created a multi-layered concept of nobility in the Islamic period of Iranian history.

Key Words:
Nobility, Ancient Iran, Islam, conceptual History, comparative Study

Keywords

Extended Abstract

Comparative study on the Nobility in the social Context of ancient Iran and early Islam

From the perspective of conceptual history

Nobility, as an important and widely used concept in social analysis, has not been understood the same throughout history and has different levels of meaning. The main issue of this essay is to understand the impact of the worldview of the two communities, late ancient Iran and the early Islamic as the two main origins, on the concept of nobility in the Islamic period of Iranian history. To answer this problem, the question must be answered as to what the nobility understood in late ancient Iran and early Islam. The word Nobility and its derivatives, such as Noblesse, are widely used today at various levels of language, whether colloquial or academic, especially in the fields of political science and sociology.

The present article intends to go beyond the current concept of Nobility in the field of social sciences, referring to the historical context of this word in the Iranian-Islamic tradition, the concept of Nobility among the ancient Iranians on the one hand and the early Muslims on the other as two origins. Late ancient Iran, politically dominated by the Sassanid dynasty, like any other society, had a powerful and influential group that had a two-way relationship with political power. This group was not linguistically identified with the word Ashraf (which is an Arabic word), but in terms of content they were a group that according to historical sources is considered equivalent to the Nobility of the Muslim community. It should be noted that different worldviews and contexts could have a different effect on the identity of the concept of Nobility.

The worldview of ancient Iranian society was based on a hierarchical structure in which the royal family had the most important influence with the sanctity it received from Farah Izadi. In addition to being abstract and subjective, it also had a social expression in the context of society. On the other hand, with the advent of Islam in Saudi Arabia, a different worldview was presented that focused on equality of all members of community. But the question is whether this worldview was able to change the identity of the Nobility and the Islamic community's understanding of the Nobility, or whether the previous context and tradition continued in how the Nobility was understood.

The present essay intends to approach the conceptual world of the two societies by examining their meaning. In the community of ancient Iran, the Nobility, although not known by exactly the same title, were a group of the classified system of the community, whose prominence separated them from the masses, while there was solidarity and cohesion among themselves. This group was understood in the community of that time with military and economic functions and belonging to the concept of Iranian land was one of their prominent features. In the first Islamic community, despite the negative semantic of Nobility in the Qur'an, the understanding of this group was a continuation of the same understanding of the previous community. The Nobility was those who inherited honor from the tribe, and because the structure of the Bedouin Arab tribes continued in the social structure of the first Islamic community, understanding of this group relied on the same functions of the pre-Islamic Nobility. A group that, due to its ability to create value solidarity, was itself a source of political power and strongly inclined to inequality with the masses. By retaining the duty of war, this group could still be considered as a property in the community without relying on wealth. The Nobility of the Islamic community did not belong to the land, but relied on the value of its lineage and tribe, which was also considered important in society and allowed them to gain privileges and create a role in politics.

Therefore, by adopting the method of conceptual history that pays attention to the social context of concept formation, it can be concluded in what context the concept of Nobility was formed. According to the method of conceptual history, some concepts cannot be interpreted explicitly, and it is the context that gives meaning to the concept, but when the concept takes on a certain semantic load, it can give shape and form to the context. According to conceptual history, concepts have layers of meaning, and their long-term meanings do not disappear with any change in the level of political and social regimes. Therefore, it can be said that the concept of Nobility in ancient Iran was understood in the form of a family structure and in Islamic society was first understood in the form of a tribe.

 

 

 

Abu Hilal al-Askari,(1412/1992),Moʼjam Alforouq va Al-loqaviyeh, investigator:Baitollah Bayat, Beirut: Alnašr Al-Islamiyeh Al-Tābeʼlejamaʼe Al-Modaresin.
āhde ārdašir,(1348/1969)investigation to Arabi:Ehsan Abbas, translate to persion: Muhammad Ali  ImamŠūštari,Tehran:Anjoman Āsar meli.
Al-Baladhuri,Ahmad Ibn Yahya,(1417/1997),Geneologies of The Nobles(Ansab Al-Ašraf),investigator: Soheil Zekar va Riyaz Zarlaki, vol5,Beirut:Dar Al-Fekr.
Al-Beyhaqi, Abu Bakr,(1361/1982),Dálaʼel Al-noboveh, translate to persion: Mahmūd máhdavī Damqanī,vol 2, Tehran: Elmi Farhangi institution.
Al-Masoudi,(1374/1995), The Meadows of Gold, translate to persion: Abolqhasem Payandeh,Tehran:Elmi Farhangi publication.
Al-Tabari,Muhammad Ibn Jarir,(1387/1968), Tariḵ Umam va al- Molouk,investigator:Abolfazl Ibrahim,vol 3,Daral-toraṯ.
Al-Zamaḵšari,(1419/1999) Asasal-Balaqa,investigator:Baselʼyun al-sud, Beirut,Dar al-kotob al-Elmiyeh.
Bashiriyeh,Hossein,(1389/2010),ǰameʼe šenasī siyasī, Tehran: Ney publication.
Bibliography
Christensen,Arthur,(1377/1998),Iran dar Zaman Sasanian, translate to persion: Rašid Yasemi: 9 edition,Tehran:Donyaye Ketab publication.
Crone, Patricia, Medieval Islamic political thought, translate to persion:Masoud Jafari,Tehran:Sokhan pablication(1389/2010)
Daryaee,Touraj,(1390/2011),The Sasanian Empire,Translate to persion:Morteza Şaqeb Far, 5 edition, Qoqnūs publication.
Dinewari, Abu Hanifa,investigator:AbdAl-Monaʼem Amer Hamaledʼdin,Qom:Manšurat Al-Razi.
Dinwari,Ibn Qutaybah,Imameh Al-Siyaseh,investigator:Ali Širi,Beirut:Dar Al-Azva.
Ferdowsi,(1396/2017),Šahnameh:Jalal ḵaleqi Motlaq,edition2, Tehran:Soḵan publication.
FirozAbadi,Mojdʼdin,(1426/2005),Al-Qamus al-Mohit, Beirut: Al-Resaleh institution.
Gazerani,Saghi,(1397/2014),the sistani cycle of Epics and Iran`s national history on the margins of historiography,translate to persion: Sima Soltani,Tehran: Markaz publication
Gnoli,Gherardo,(1378/1999),idea of Iran, Translate to persion:Sayyed Mansour Sajjadi,Tehran:Pishin PaẐouh.
Ibn Abiʼl-Hadid,(1378/1999),Şarhe Nahj al-Balaqeh, investigator:Muhammad Abolfazl Ibrahim,vol 2, Dar AlHayaʼAlkotob Alarabiya.
Ibn al-athir(1371/1992), ālkamél,translate to persian: Abolghasem Hãlat,vol 9,Tehran: Matbouat Elmi institution.
Ibn Hisham,Sirat Ibn Hisham,investigator: Ibrahim Al-biyari va Abdel Hafeez Šelby,first edition,Beirut: DarAl-Mārefeh.
Ibn khaldun(1363/1984), translate to persian: Abdolmohammad Ayati,vol 2. Tehran:Motaelat va Tahghighat Farhangi institution.
Ibn Manzur, Lisan Al-Arab,Beirut:DarAl-Sād.
-Ibn sáad(1374/1995), Al-Tabaghat Al-Kabir,translate to persian: Mahmūd máhdavī Damqanī, vol 6, Tehran: Farhang va Andisheh.
ǰarbaȥqani,Abu Alšaraf,(1374/1995), Translate of Tārikh Yamini,Tehran:Elmi Farhangi publication.
Johnston, James Howard,state and society in late Antique Iran, editor: Sara Stewart, translator: Kazem Firuzmand, first Edition, Tehran:Markazi.
 John Haldon and Lawrence i. Conrad, eds. (2004), the byzantine and early Islamic near east: elites old and new, studies in late antiquity and early Islam (Princeton, N.J.: Darwin press). Reviewed by Mary f. Thurlkill, (2007), International Journal of Middle East, volume39
Koselleck, Reinhart, (1996), “a response to comments on the geschichtliche grundbegriffe”, in “the meaning of historical terms and concepts, new studies on Begriffsgeschichte”, trans. by Melvin Richter and sally Robertson, edited by Hartmut Lehmann and Melvin Richter, German historical institute, Washington,d.c. pp. 59-70
Koselleck, Reinhart, (2002), “social history and conceptual history” in the practice of conceptual history, timing history spacing concepts, Stanford university press, PP20-37
 Koselleck, Reinhart, (2004), “Begriffsgeschichte and social history”. In “futures past”, translated by Keith tribe, Colombia university press, New York, pp. 75-92
Kahhala,Umar rida,(1414/1994), Moʼjam qabāel, Beirut: Al-Resaleh.
Kelley, Donald R,(1996), “On the Margins of   Begriffsgeschichte ”, in “the meaning of historical terms and concepts, new studies on Begriffsgeschichte”, trans. by Melvin Richter and sally Robertson, edited by Hartmut Lehmann and Melvin Richter, German historical institute, Washington,d.c. pp.35-40
Khaleghi Motlagh,ǰalal,(1369/1990),Biǰan va Manižeh va Vis va Rāmin, introduction of Parti va Sasani literature,Iranshenasi jornal,year2,273-298.
Khosraw ī kowādan ud Rédāg-é,(1391/2012),ǰamasb ǰi Dastur Asana,investigation of Saeed Oryan,Tehran:Elmi
Letter of Tansar,correction:Mojtaba Minovi,second edition,ḵarazmi publication.
Lewis,Bernard,(1378,1999), Zaban siyasi Islam, translate to persion:qolamreza Behrūz Lak,Qom,Daftar Tabliqat Islami publication.
Little,Daniel,Varieties of social Explanation:An introduction to the philosophy of social science, translate to persion:AbdolKarim Soroush,5 edition,Tehran:Serat publication.
MehrAfarin,Reza,(1398/2019),Šahrhay Sasani,third edition,Tehran:Samt publication.
Menog-I Khrad,translate to persion: Ahmad Tafazoli and Ẑale Amouzagar,7edition,Tehran:Tous publication.
Meskawayh,AbuAli, Tajarob Al-Umam, investigation: Abolqasem Emami,Tehran:Sorouš publication.
Morony Michael, (1974), “religious communities in late Sasanian and early Muslim Iraq”, journal of the economic and social history of the orient
Muhammad ibn Ali Ibn al- Tiqtaqā,(1418/1998), Alfaḵri, investigator: Abdol al-Qadir muhammad Mayo,Beirut:Dar Al-qalam Al-Arabi.
Muhammad Ibn Jarir Tabari, Tariḵ Tabari, translate to persion:Abolqasem Payandeh, Tehran:Asatir publication.
Muhammad Najar va Ahmad al-zebab,(1425/2005), Moʼjam al-vasit,cairo:Majma al-loqah al-arabi.
Muhammadi Malayeri,Muhammad,(1379/2000), Tariḵ va Farhang Iran dar Dūran Enteqal az asre Sasani be asre Islami, first edition, Tehran,Tous publication.
Nӧldeke,Theodor,(1378/1999), Iranian and Arab History in Sasanian Period, translate to persion: Abbas Zaryab, second edition,Tehran:institute for humanities and cultural studies.
Oʼryan,Saeed,(1392/2013), Rahnamā Katibeh hay Irani Miyaneh: Pahlavi va Parti, first edition, Tehran:Elmi.
Pourshariati, Parvane, (2008), Decline and fall of the Sasanian Empire, the Sasanian-Parthian Confederacy and the Arab conquest of Iran. Published by I.B.Touris & CO Ltd in association with the Iran Heritage foundation, New York
Ragin, Charles c (2004) ,comparative methodology the logic of case oriented research, department of sociology, university of Arizona USA.
Smelser, Neil. j. (2003) "on comparative analysis, interdisciplinary and internationalization in sociology", international sociology, 18(4): 643-657
. May, 1974, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp113-135
Saediyan Jázi,Maryam.(1394/2015),«Manabeé Daramad māli Umayyad»,Motaëlat Islamic:Tarikh va Farhang, series47, number 94.
ŠapūrŠahbazi,Alireza,(1389/2010),Sasanian History,translate Sasanian part of Tabari and compare with Balāmi, translate and search,first edition, Markaz Našr Danešgahi.
Şaqafi kūfi, Ibrahim Ebu Ishaq,(1371/1992),Alqarat, translate to persion: Azizullah Atarodi,Tehran: Atarod publication.
Sayyid Rażi,(1380/2001),Nahj Al-Balagha, translate to persion: Sayyed ǰafar Šahidi,Tehran:Elmi Farhangi publication.
-Shayegan,M.Rahim,(2013), "Sasanian Political Ideology". The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Iran. Ed.D.T.potts. Oxford University press, pp.805-813
Theda Skočpol(1388/2009), Vision and Method in historical sociology,Translate to persion: Hašem Aqaǰari, Tehran: Ney publication.
Van horn Melton, James,(1996), “Otto Brunner and ideological origins of begriffsgeschichte”, in “the meaning of historical terms and concepts, new studies on begriffsgeschichte”, trans. by Melvin Richter and Sally e.Robertson, edited by Hartmut Lehmann and Melvin Richter, German historical institute, washington,d.c. pp. 21-34
Widengren,Geo,Der Feudalismus Im Alten Iran, Translate to persion: Hūşang Sadeqi, first edition,Tehran:Ameh publication.
YarŞater, Ehsan,(1387/2008), “ Iranian Society and law” in The Cambridge History of Iran,vol 3, translate: Hasan AnūŠeh,forth edition,Tehran:AmirKabir.
YarŞater, Ehsan,(1387/2008), “king societies and nobelness layers” in The cambridge History of Iran, translator: Hasan AnūŠeh,forth edition,Tehran:AmirKabir.